Ascenditt
E-commerce, SaaS and home services. The HVAC work described is portfolio scale.
Listed but not scored. The HVAC case study is dated 1 August 2024, every case study on the site is dated 2024, and the footer reads 2022. Scoring a real business against evidence that old would measure the website rather than the agency.
No ads running under their own Page on 12 September 2026.
Confirmed twice, by two independent methods: a name search filtered to this advertiser, and a direct query of Page ID 105267014182151 across all ad statuses. The Page ID was checked against the canonical address of their Facebook Page before we trusted it.
A statement about one date, and not a verdict. What a zero does and does not mean, and the false zero this method nearly produced.
What they are strongest on
The only portfolio-scale HVAC Meta work described by anyone here: more than thirty companies under one private equity owner.
Where they are weakest
That scale is exactly what makes a geo holdout possible, with enough separate markets to randomise and enough volume to power it. What is published instead is aggregate optimisation across those markets, which is a sensible thing to do and tells you nothing about what the ads caused. It is the clearest illustration on this site of the difference between testing a lot and running a test.
Recorded as their claims, with what each one is missing. Nothing here is restated by us as fact.
| What they publish | What it does not say |
|---|---|
| "Scaled 30+ HVAC & Plumbing companies via Meta Ads, average ROAS of $7" | Their figure. No attribution window, no denominator, no date range. |
| "We acquired warm HVAC install or repair leads for under $100" | Their figure, with the same gaps. |
Read from ascenditt.com, HVAC Meta ads case study and homepage on 12 September 2026, against published criteria. Page changed since? The corrections page gets it re-read.